Houston Methodist. Leading Medicine

Knee News

Computer Navigation and Minimally Invasive Knee Replacements

In this study, surgeons combine two new methods of performing a total knee replacement (TKR). A computer-assisted and minimally invasive (MI) approach were both used. They compare the results with patients who have had the standard open incision TKR. Details of both operations were provided.

The patients in both groups were matched in terms of range of motion, strength, and function before surgery. Everyone received the same type of implant. The computer navigation system made it possible to make accurate bone cuts and achieve specific implant position.

X-rays were taken of the operative leg in the weight-bearing position one month after the TKR. Angles of alignment were measured and compared between the two groups. Tests of function were also repeated.

The authors report a much shorter operating time for the standard TKR. The computer-assisted MI approach was an average of 24 minutes longer than the standard method. Function was improved with the computer-assisted MI procedure. Patients in the MI group were walking without assistance 30 days after the operation.

The biggest difference between the two groups was in leg alignment. More patients in the computer-assisted MI group had near normal (neutral) alignment compared with the group who had a standard TKR.

Patients in the computer-assisted MI group advanced faster through the post-operative exercise program. As a result, they went home sooner than the standard TKR group.

Minimally invasive TKR without computer navigation can increase the risk of implant malpositioning. Using a computer to analyze details about the joint can result in improved limb alignment. This increased accuracy also decreases the risk of implant failure from excessive wear, loosening, or instability.

More research is needed to compare groups of patients who have the computer-assisted approach, minimally-invasive approach only, standard TKR, and various combinations of each. Other problems linked with MI TKR, such as poor cement implantation, must still be worked out before this approach is routinely used.

Andrew Quoc Dutton, MBBS, FRCS, et al. Computer-Assisted Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty. In Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. January 2008. Vol. 90. No. 1. Pp. 2-9.


*Disclaimer:* The information contained herein is compiled from a variety of sources. It may not be complete or timely. It does not cover all diseases, physical conditions, ailments or treatments. The information should NOT be used in place of visit with your healthcare provider, nor should you disregard the advice of your health care provider because of any information you read in this topic.
All content provided by eORTHOPOD® is a registered trademark of Medical Multimedia Group, L.L.C.. Content is the sole property of Medical Multimedia Group, LLC and used herein by permission.

Our Specialties

Where Does It Hurt?

Our Locations

  Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on YouTube
Follow us on Twitter